Section navigation

William Cunningham: Humble Controversialist

Category Articles
Date October 21, 2024

The following short article appeared in Issue 690 of the Banner of Truth Magazine (March 2021).

The first volume of William Cunningham’s works to be prepared for the press by his literary executors, James Buchanan and James Bannerman, was The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation. It was published in 1862, a few months after Cunningham’s death, and reprinted by the Banner of Truth Trust in 1967.

The contents of the volume began life as class lectures to the students of the New College in Edinburgh. They were later published over several years in the form of ten elaborate essays contributed to The British and Foreign Evangelical Review. It is these essays—lightly edited—that we have in The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation. ‘They were written upon a plan’, say his editors, ‘and as an orderly series of discussions, embracing the leading historical characters, and the great developments of scriptural truth at the time of the Reformation’ (p.v).

In the second of the essays, entitled ‘Luther’, Cunningham vigorously defends the reformer against certain groundless attacks made on him by the eminent Scottish philosopher, Sir William Hamilton. The essay was originally published in the British and Foreign for April 1856. In the October number for the same year a follow-on article was published on the subject of ‘The Reformers and the Doctrine of Assurance’. This too was written in response to Sir William Hamilton. In the interval between the two articles Sir William died. In a footnote to the reprint of the October article in The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation, Cunningham’s editors give a brief quotation from the original introduction. In it Cunningham expresses regret for the tone in which he had written his first article. What follows is the full text of that introduction. It amply vindicates the title of this piece, ‘Humble Controversialist’:

‘When the April number of this journal, containing, in a review of Archdeacon Hare’s ‘Vindication of Luther’, an exposure of Sir William Hamilton’s attacks upon the great Reformer, was published, we were not aware that the health of the distinguished individual on whose statements we commented so freely was worse than it had been for  some years past. We did not know that he was less able to defend himself, or to repel any attack that might be made upon him, than he was when he published the second edition of his ‘Discussions.’ It was with surprise and sincere sorrow that soon after we learned that he had, somewhat suddenly, been called away from this fleeting scene. We could not but be struck and solemnised by the unexpected intelligence of his decease, when we had been so recently adducing serious charges against him at the bar of public opinion, and labouring to prove that these charges were well-founded. We were not conscious, indeed, of being influenced by any ill-will or vindictiveness towards Sir William Hamilton; and we have not, and never had, any apprehension that we had done him any injustice. We are deliberately persuaded that every charge we adduced against him was true and proved, and that the whole of the indignation we expressed was most amply merited by the conduct on his part that called it forth. But while justice to truth and to ourselves requires us to say this, we must at the same time confess, that in some parts of the article referred to, we were tempted to speak of our antagonist in a tone which, though in ordinary circumstances it might have been excused by the very peculiar provocation furnished, his speedy and unexpected death has led us to regret. The knowledge, if we had possessed it, that he was to die so soon, would assuredly have modified somewhat the tone in which the discussion was conducted,—would have shut out something of its lightness and severity, and imparted to it more of solemnity and tenderness; and the knowledge that we did possess, that he, as well as ourselves, was liable every day to be called out of this world and summoned into God’s presence, ought to have produced this result. Alas! alas! how little are we in the habit of living fully under the powers of the world to come, and of realising and remembering, with reference either to ourselves or others, that we do not know what a day or an hour may bring forth! It would surely infuse a much better tone and spirit into controversy, if those who engage in it were more in the habit of remembering, that it is quite possible that the next thing they hear of him with whose statements they are dealing so freely, may be, that he has been summoned into the presence of his final Judge.’1The British & Foreign Evangelical Review, October 1856, pp.927-928

William Cunningham was described after his death as ‘one of the…most loveable of Scottish men.’2R. Rainy & J. Mackenzie, The Life of William Cunningham (London: Nelson, 1871), p. 478. The touching humility exhibited in these words was no small part of what made him so.

Latest Articles

The Death-Bed of John Knox: A Poem, by Anne Ross Cousin February 18, 2025

Anne Ross Cousin is best known as the authoress of the hymn, The sands of time are sinking. Its nineteen verses (in its original form) are based on the death-bed sayings of a remarkable seventeenth century Scottish preacher, Samuel Rutherford. What is not so well known is that Anne Ross Cousin put into verse some […]

First Things First January 6, 2025

The following article from the pen of A. W. Pink appeared in the January 1978 issue of the Banner of Truth Magazine, no. 172. It was the New Year message from Studies in the Scriptures, January 1939. The dawning of a new year is a fresh call unto each of us to put first things […]