Deadly Trends of Popular Christianity
Consider what has happened in the church over the past decades. The 1970s were an exciting time. We saw an unprecedented rise in conservative evangelicalism, the explosion of Christian broadcasting and publishing, a number of excellent new Bible translations and study aids, the proliferation of small-group Bible studies, and tremendous growth in Bible-believing congregations.
In the midst of it all, one sensed a sincere desire to exalt the Lord, a love for God’s Word, a hunger to understand it, and – within the church, at least – a renewed interest in holiness, combatting the steady moral decay that had gained such a foothold forty years ago.
Those phenomena could have been harbingers of genuine spiritual revival.
But the ’80s were a decade of decline. Not numerical decline in most of our churches (though I’m concerned that this may happen yet), but a spiritual decline. The church has actually turned away from true revival and pursued instead the popularisation of Christianity.
The pop church is everywhere. It is perhaps most evident on religious television, where the diet of celebrity variety shows and other forms of entertainment has decreased the taste for worship. It is quickly gaining a foothold in Christian radio, where phone-in talk shows and live psychotherapy are replacing Bible teaching as the staple. It has ravaged local churches, turning them into little more than social clubs and community centres where the focus is on the individual’s felt needs, not on the church’s function as the body of Christ in the world.
The trends of pop Christianity pose dangers more subtle than the liberalism that threatened the church in the first half of the century. Instead of attacking orthodoxy head on, the pop church gives lip service to the truth while quietly undermining the foundations of doctrine. The pop church is not a single movement or visible organisation. Tendencies toward popular religion can be found even in some of the finest churches and Christian organisations in evangelicalism.
First, there is in vogue today a tendency to make the basis of faith something other than God’s Word
Experience, emotion, fashion, and popular opinion are often in reality more authoritative than the Bible in determining what many Christians believe. Secular psychology, for instance, has virtually superseded God’s Word at the core of curriculum in some of our conservative seminaries. Christian counselling reflects this drift, frequently offering no more than experimental and unscriptural self-help therapy instead of solid answers from the Bible. That’s true among local churches as well. It has become quite fashionable to forego the proclamation and teaching of God’s Word in worship services. Instead, churches serve up a smorgasbor of drama, music, and other forms of entertainment. All of this dethrones Scripture from its rightful place as the basis for our faith.
Second, pop Christianity has a tendency to move the focus of faith away from God’s Son.
You’ve seen that repeatedly if you watch much religious television. Centre stage belongs to the celebrity evangelist, the fund-raising campaign, or the miracles and healings – anything but the Lord Jesus.Furthermore, the faith those programmes ordinarily exemplify is surrealistic. The health-wealth-and-prosperity gospel advocated by so many televangelists is the ultimate example of this kind of fantasy-faith. Appealing unabashedly to the flesh, this false gospel corrupts all the promises of Scripture and encourages greed. It makes material blessing, not Jesus Christ, the object of the Christian’s desires. Easy-believism handles the message differently, but the effect is the same. Here is the perfect message for pop Christianity. It is the promise of forgiveness minus the gospel’s hard demands. It has done much to popularise ‘believing’ but little to provoke sincere faith.
Christ is no longer the focus of the message. We may hear his name mentioned from time to time, but the real focus seems inward, not upward. People are urged to look within; to try to understand themselves; to come to grips with their problems, their hurts, their disappointments; to have their needs met, their desires granted, their wants fulfilled. Nearly all the popular versions of the message encourage and legitimize a self-centred perspective.
Such an emphasis cannot help but shift the focus away from Christ.
Third, today’s pop Christianity is infected with a tendency to view the result of faith as something less than God’s standard of holy living.
I thought of this recently as one of the fallen televangelists was again in the news. Several of his loyalists were demonstrating against his conviction and imprisonment by carrying signs with the word ‘FORGIVEN!’ in large red letters.
We must be forgiving, but forgiveness is not the end and the aim of the Christian faith; holiness unto the Lord is (2 Cor. 7:1, Eph. 1:4; 5:25-27).
Think about it: What could Satan do to try to destroy the church that would be more effective than undermining God’s Word, shifting the focus off Christ, and minimizing holy living? All those things are happening slowly, steadily within the church right now. Tragically, most Christians seem oblivious to the problems, satisfied with a Christianity that is fashionable and highly visible.
The true church must not ignore these threats. If we fight to keep the church pure, we can conquer external attacks easily. But if we let error into the church, we will not be able to regain the purity without waging civil war.
I fear that may be happening even now. The 21st century church has become so broad and inclusive that many otherwise sound Christians avoid speaking the truth for fear of being divisive. For example, a major Christian radio network wrote to ask me not to teach again on a certain passage of Scripture. ‘We agree with what you say,’ the network executive told me, ‘but many of our constituents do not, and we’re committed to peace.’
We cannot have peace if it means we must avoid whole passages of Scripture! The unity Jesus prayed for is a unity based on common commitment to truth. It is a oneness made possible because we are sanctified in the truth (John 17:19-21), not a false unity borne of compromise.
May today’s church reverse these trends and pray instead for a fresh infusion of the Holy Spirit’s power.
Taken with permission from Masterpiece, January/February 1990.
Reading the Puritans. November 11, 2021
‘When I think of the Puritans, I think of a high view of Scripture.’ This Christmas season, shop the best prices on Puritan Paperbacks, collected works, and the Puritan Box Sets. https://www.youtube.com/embed/GG4JCSx_yAI Click here to shop now.
What Does it Mean to Be A Christian? According to Luther, Melanchthon, Tyndale and Calvin October 21, 2021
The following is an excerpt from Evangelicalism Divided, (pp 154-158) by Iain H. Murray. Read the article, and then consider taking advantage of the special prices during the week-long Reformation Day Special. See below for more information on the special. The lives of the Reformers are examples of men who, no longer content to trust […]