NOTICE: Store prices and specials on the Banner of Truth UK site are not available for orders shipped to North America. Please use the Banner of Truth USA site .

Section navigation

A Review of Fred Sanders’ Fountain of Salvation: Trinity and Soteriology

Category Book Reviews
Date September 12, 2025

Banner trustee Donald John MacLean (Westminster Seminary UK) reviews Fred Sanders’ Fountain of Salvation: Trinity and Soteriology (Eerdmans, 2021, 221pp., pbk £19.99) in the latest issue of the Banner of Truth magazine.

Fred Sanders is one of the leading contemporary evangelical voices on the doctrine of the Trinity and contributions by him on any matter related to trinitarian theology are to be welcomed. However, as this volume is in many respects an engagement with contemporary scholarship (with all that entails), this is not his most accessible work. Still, it repays careful reading.

Sanders’ main concern in this work is to bring together two doctrines which should never be separated—those of the Trinity and salvation. In pursuing this goal, Sanders covers areas such as ‘The Trinity as the Norm for Soteriology,’ ‘Trinity and Atonement,’ ‘Salvation and the Eternal Generation of the Son,’ and ‘Salvation and the Eternal Procession of the Spirit.’ His treatment of the importance of eternal generation is a highlight of the book, as is his concluding chapter, ‘Retrieval and the Doctrine of the Trinity.’ This chapter is, perhaps, the most evaluative in the book and highlights problems with many modern trinitarian constructions and historical narratives.

This book will further enhance Sanders’ reputation as a theologian of the Trinity, and rightly so. Nevertheless, it raises at least two important questions. First, there seems to be a risk of undermining the importance of genuine soteriological differences, or at least subordinating them to a common trinitarian orthodoxy. Consider the statement, ‘the health of the doctrine of the Trinity is a good indicator of the overall vigour and balance of a theological system’ (27). Well, yes, it is a necessary indicator, but not a sufficient indicator of good theological health. A common trinitarian orthodoxy is shared by the Westminster Confession and by the Council of Trent, but hardly an equally vigorous and balanced theological system.

The second relates to the nature of academic theological writing. A dizzying array of conversation partners fills the book. From deeply orthodox figures to heterodox theologians (particularly the chapter on ‘The Modern Trinity’), to traditional and modern Roman Catholic theologians. But there is little to indicate the chasm between these figures on the very principia of theology. If there is a material divergence on the principium cognoscendi externum (revelation) or the principium cognoscendi internum (faith), then dialogue as equal ecumenical conversation partners is impossible. Reformed theology has gladly acknowledged all truth as God’s truth, and been happy to plunder the Egyptians, but it is another thing to treat them as fellow labourers in ‘the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth’ (1 Tim. 3:15).

 

Also in this issue (October 2025):

Subscribe to the Banner of Truth Magazine 

Latest Articles

On the Trail of the Covenanters 12 February 2026

The first two episodes of The Covenanter Story are now available. In an article that first appeared in the February edition of the Banner magazine, Joshua Kellard relates why the witness of the Scottish Covenanters is worthy of the earnest attention of evangelical Christians today. In late November of last year, on the hills above […]

A Martyr’s Last Letter to His Wife 11 February 2026

In the first video of The Covenanter Story, which releases tomorrow, we tell the story of James Guthrie, the first great martyr of the Covenant. On June 1, the day he was executed for high treason, he coursed the following farewell letter to his wife: “My heart,— Being within a few hours to lay down […]